HerrLjunga
Vital 1st Team Regular
Started election work yesterday at 6am, finished 2am this morning, back in at 7.45am, still at the count centre now. Love an election with a turnout of 18%...
So that's what you do with your spare time Herr when the season is over and there are no pre-match briefings to write mate!!!!! Roll on the new season, I'm missing your briefings already manStarted election work yesterday at 6am, finished 2am this morning, back in at 7.45am, still at the count centre now. Love an election with a turnout of 18%...
NHS budget has increased every year since 2015. So how has that been under-funded?Is that a serious question or a whoosh?
In case it's a serious question, could the answer be spending on covid? Because it certainly wasn't overspending on public services.
Is the NHS the only public service then?NHS budget has increased every year since 2015. So how has that been under-funded?
It's not money which is the problem, it's demand.
Isn't it the most important?Is the NHS the only public service then?
And you think you do that with high taxes?Failure to invest and grow the economy over a sustained period.
Totally benign counter-arguement. Whether it is the most important or not (which is entirely dependant upon one's circumstances and social impacts of all other types of public expenditure), there are many other forms of public expenditure.Isn't it the most important?
Genuine question, how has it changed since 2010 and how does this compare to inflation?NHS budget has increased every year since 2015. So how has that been under-funded?
No offence intended but you can look it up. I've genuinely no idea.Genuine question, how has it changed since 2010 and how does this compare to inflation?
No offence intended but you can look it up. I've genuinely no idea.
It’s a somewhat meaningless statistic. It doesn’t account for the needs of an ageing population. The King’s Fund which does health research showed that the share of National Income has only fallen twice in the history of the NHS, once during the Thatcher years and from the start of the coalition to date. We also spend less of our GDP on health than other equivalent nations. We also have one of the smallest numbers of beds per ‘000 people across the whole of European states.No offence intended but you can look it up. I've genuinely no idea.
I know it's increased every year since 2015 because i looked after the whole Brexit-bus debacle.
Hmmmm I'd have to disagree.Totally benign counter-arguement. Whether it is the most important or not (which is entirely dependant upon one's circumstances and social impacts of all other types of public expenditure), there are many other forms of public expenditure.
You know that load of money that ended up in the pockets of Tory chums in return for undelivered PPE and the completely failed Track and Trace system (38bn on the latter alone I believe)?NHS budget has increased every year since 2015. So how has that been under-funded?
It's not money which is the problem, it's demand.
Because of both.In fact, after pondering on it, those Scandinavian countries are high in happiness because they have low inequality. This is not the same as high/low tax.
But that is exactly the point. You jump on my comment about Truss proposing to slash taxes, almost exclusively for rich corporations and individuals, in an immediate and severe manner and you talk about increasing taxes. Nobody mentioned that.In fact, after pondering on it, those Scandinavian countries are high in happiness because they have low inequality. This is not the same as high/low tax.
You miss out (unfortunately) that it is also driven by very high wages in the first placeBecause of both.
Agree, low inequality is very important. The low inequality is driven by the high taxes hence redistribution of wealth and high quality public services and provision of facilities.
Plus very high prices.You miss out (unfortunately) that it is also driven by very high wages in the first place
My reason of your criticism for Truss is that our tax is too high and she was trying to address it to stimulate the economy. She was only hounded out because of the economc climate at the time. We had inflation and she was being aggressive. Right now her ideas would be perfect.But that is exactly the point. You jump on my comment about Truss proposing to slash taxes, almost exclusively for rich corporations and individuals, in an immediate and severe manner and you talk about increasing taxes. Nobody mentioned that.
Are you not aware that we already statistically have the highest tax burden ever? As the Tories have been in power for 14 years of course that is now spread among the "have nots" as much as the "haves" and the higher tax band rates have therefore stayed low for the rich. No bigger reason for inequality than that, and Truss was just trying to make it worse.